A successful claim in Michigan requires both strong factual evidence of an illegal sale and perfect adherence to the state’s demanding procedural rules.
A critical and often misunderstood rule in Michigan is the requirement that the plaintiff must name the intoxicated person as a defendant in the lawsuit and must “retain” them in the case. An early or improper settlement with the intoxicated individual can be fatal to the claim against the establishment.
Before filing a lawsuit, a potential plaintiff must provide written notice to the licensee within 120 days of entering into an attorney-client relationship. I can provide crucial analysis regarding compliance with this strict deadline.
Explaining concepts like “visibly intoxicated” and the “name and retain” rule to a jury requires a clear communication style. I have the experience to convey these points in Michigan courtrooms, including the Wayne County Circuit Court.
My services are designed to provide comprehensive support for the unique challenges of the Michigan Dram Shop Act.
A confidential review of the facts to determine the strength of the “visibly intoxicated” claim.
A critical assessment of case procedure to ensure compliance with the Act’s strict rules.
Meticulous analysis of all documentation, including police reports, receipts, MLCC training records, witness statements, and video surveillance.
Professionally written reports designed to withstand scrutiny and clearly articulate how the evidence supports a claim under Michigan law.
Clear, concise, and compelling testimony delivered with the composure and authority required for these cases.
My focus is singular, allowing for a depth of knowledge across the full spectrum of claims under the Michigan Dram Shop Act.
Connecting a tragic outcome to an establishment’s illegal sale of alcohol to a visibly intoxicated person or a minor.
Providing expert consultation on the strategic implications of the “name and retain” rule throughout the litigation process.
Analyzing the objective, observable signs of intoxication to build a compelling case that a server knew or should have known the patron was intoxicated.
I provide expert witness services for cases throughout the State of Michigan, including:
The Detroit Metro Area, including Wayne, Oakland, & Macomb Counties
Grand Rapids and Kent County
Warren and Macomb County
Sterling Heights and Macomb County
Lansing and Ingham County
Ann Arbor and Washtenaw County
Get answers to common questions about Michigan dram shop cases, expert witness services, legal timelines, and consultation procedures statewide.
It’s a strict rule requiring the injured party to name the allegedly intoxicated person as a defendant in their lawsuit and to keep them as a defendant throughout the case. You generally cannot settle with the intoxicated person and continue the lawsuit against only the bar.
Once a plaintiff has hired an attorney for a potential dram shop claim, they have 120 days to give written notice of their intent to sue to the bar or restaurant.
I provide a clear, detailed fee schedule upon request. My goal is to offer transparent and predictable pricing to assist you with your case planning and budget.
If you are building a liquor liability case in Michigan, you must be prepared to address the state's unique procedural hurdles from day one. Contact me today for a confidential, no-obligation consultation.
Across hospitality, entertainment, and legal industries.
Providing objective analysis for plaintiff and defense.
Send Your Have Any Questions?
Book An Appointment
